| A
Report of the Mark Rashid Clinic - Rivendell Farm - Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
October 19, 1999
"You've gotta be
Alpha horse in his eyes."
"Show him who's boss."
"Get after him, make him do it."
"He has to respect you, no matter what."
You'll hear those
words a lot around the horse world, but you sure won't hear them from
Mark Rashid. The soft-spoken Colorado horseman spreads a philosophy that
favors partnership instead of dominance, guidance instead of restraint,
support and help instead of correction, faith instead of fear.
Mark's clinic in
Chapel Hill included seven one-hour private sessions, offering a good
sampling of the Rashid philosophy applied to various mounts and issues.
Common themes ran through all the sessions, so that's how I'll share my
impressions.
Theme #1 -
Horses don't disobey; they obey what we've unknowingly taught them.
Behaviors we might
perceive as disrespect are generally not so, Mark says. "If he's always
been told it's okay to do that, it's not a matter of loss of respect."
For example, working
with a horse on the ground, Mark asked us to watch what the horse did
after he committed to the halt with one foreleg. Did the second foreleg
stop behind the first foreleg? Square up? An inch ahead? Three inches
ahead?
In ways as small
as this, the horse asks us, "Is it okay if I creep up on you?" If we're
busy thinking of bigger actions, chatting with friends, or admiring the
scenery, we might be saying to the horse, "Sure, that's okay. I don't
mind if you creep up three inches." The next time, he creeps up three
inches twice. Then three inches thrice.
"Pretty soon, you
have the horse running into your elbow or passing you by, only it's because
you've allowed him to", Mark said. It appears the horse is being disobedient,
but, in fact, he is only obeying what we accidentially taught him.
Now, this isn't news
to anyone, is it? We all know the aphorism: "Every time you're with your
horse, you're training him, for better or for worse." But it can be enlightening
to really, truly watch closely and wee how subtle this accidental training
can be!
Theme #2 -
It's more about awareness than about action.
Theme #2 is a natural
corollary to the previous theme. With greater awareness of the beginnings
of behavior, you don't have to engage in such big actions to direct the
behavior where you want it. Therefore, Mark urged us to tune in closely
to nuances that perhaps we'd overlooked; feeling for that moment when
the horse is setting up for a response, rather than the moment it takes
place, or the moment after. You're looking to release at the first indication
of compliance, not after the request is fully obliged.
This principle was
where I had gone awry with my gentle homebred, not as "in front of the
leg" as I wanted. Intuitively, I knew to ask with the lighest aid, and
release when the life came up. Intellectually, I'd have said that's exactly
what I had been doing. But when challenged to really put awareness to
the task, I agreed I was releasing a second or two too late, and sometimes
applying the leg out of sync with what I was getting from my horse.
The "less is more"
philosophy, coupled with miscroscopic attention to timing, worked like
a charm. Within 20 minutes, Chance was coasting in a ground-covering free
walk, no reminder necessary. Such a tiny change in how I rode him, producing
such a big change in how he rode.
If sombebody related
this example to me before the clinic, I'd have thought, "Big deal, just
good timing and proper aids." That afternoon, I received a new picture
of what "good timing" and "proper use" can mean.
Theme #3 -
Do less to get more.
"I want the horse
to pay attention to me, not to my tools", Mark said. "That's why all the
tools you'll see me use to train a horse are right there in that bag.",
he said, pointing to a duffel bag barely big enough for a trip to the
gym. All we ever saw emerge from the bag was a plain web halter and a
rope lunge line.
How do we get results
without tools to make ourselves bigger, extend our reach, overcome our
human frailties? By being aware of behaviors when they are very small,
supporting and guiding the horse at that stage, and not allowing behaviors
to escalate to where tools and gimmicks would seem to be the only way
out.
How do we get away
with doing less? By releasing more, and with better timing. For instance,
Mark pointed out that one rider, when using a soft leading rein, kept
contact on the rein even as the horse was turning. "If you keep pulling
the rein when he's starting to turn, he'll start to brace." Release when
you get the response, or else you are breaking the trust.
He asked anouther
rider how many times she tapped her horse to move past the gate. "Three
times", she said. "SEVEN times", Mark responded. "He was telling you way
back there that he understood you, but you couldn't feel it because your
legs were too busy." Breaking the trust.
Mark's sugggestion
to hold the squeeze until the horse got livelier, then release immediately,
was foreign to me. I'd been taught that squeezing makes a horse dull to
leg, and a lively tap was more effective. Not so, according to Mark. "With
a tap, tap, you're rewarding him every time you take your leg off, rewarding
him for doing the wrong thing. He learns from the release."
Theme #4 -
If you're going to err, err on the side of helping the horse.
What to do about shying?
The conventional dictum many of us were raised on was the need to have
the horse face up to the object of his fear. Mark has a different take
on it.
"Ten years ago, I'd
ride through it", Mark said to the owner of a spooky mare. "Now I'd more
likely get off and walk her through it. Think about it: She's screaming
at you, 'I'm really troubled', and then do you want to drop her off the
deep end anyway?"
Sometimes the best
thing is to let it go. If you don't make a big deal out of it, the horse
is likely to figure it is no big deal. Granted, it's not always necessary
to dismount and lead the horse through the demons, but as Mark put it,
"If you're going to err, err on the side of helping him out."
Theme #5 -
Look at the whole horse.
With each horse brought
before him, Mark looked beyond the obvious and explicit behavior, asking
questions that provided a holistic context; questions about feed, management,
related behaviors, medical history, and prior experience.
The questions were
all part of troubleshooting, often yielding clues to behavioral problems.
Of course, if we look at the big picture, there's always the fear of getting
the answers we don't want, like "You're to blame for this issue", or "Find
another job for which this horse is more physically suited."
"Dont' look for the
solution, look for the cause", Mark said. "When you find the cause, you'll
have your solution."
Theme #6 -
It's not about doing battle; it's about finding a way to get along.
"People make corrections
like they really enjoy doing it", Mark lamented. "You're not supposed
to like correcting him."
Mark emphasized finding
ways to help the horse to success, rather than setting him up to fail
only to be corrected for it. "He just wants to get along, and we can help
him find a place where we can get along."
"You don't want to
be fighting with him", Mark said to a rider whose horse was pushing through
the bit during the walk-to-halt transition. What Mark considers to be
a human fighting with the horse is what many/most folks would call the
horse bracing against the human. Sense a different connotation here?
"The softer you're
getting, the less brace you're getting from the horse", he told one rider.
"The arguments are going away because now we haven't argued with him."
It did seem that the
less the riders did, the more their horses were open to being asked for
more. The horse doesn't shirk working with the human, just looks for a
place where he can get along.
Theme #7 -
There's a difference betweeen riding ON the horse and riding WITH the
horse.
Assemble all the
prvious themes: timing, release, awareness, attitude, mutual respect,
helping the horse, and you're starting to ride with the horse rather than
on him, by Mark's definition.
It's an intangible
concept, but there are visible manifestations that convey the idea. For
instance, it's anticipating the downward transition and riding the first
step of the new gait as it develops, rather than getting the downward
transition and then adopting the body posture/rhythm of the new gait.
It's having a clear
vision of the response you're seeking, and being absolutely consistent
guiding the horse to that vision and appreciating him for reaching it.
It's seeking maximum softness in every interaction, on and off his back.
It's identifying the most subtle messaging between horse and human, and
responding at a point when you can be very quiet, not waiting until the
little messages become arguments.
It's communicating
with seat, wherever and whenever possible, following up with the hands
only when necessary.
It's looking for a
mental connection with the horse, seeing where his mind is and responding
to that rather than fixating on the physical. The ideal is a mutually
respectful connection in which the horse is engaged in a two-way communication
with the human.
Folks who want to
quietly get along with their horses and offer their horses the best deal
they can; folks who credit their horses as having value to bring to the
"conversation"; those folks will find affirmation, new ideas, and a new
level of awareness from the soft-spoken cowboy from Estes Park, Colorado.
|